[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171102231507.18f6b3b6@vmware.local.home>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 23:15:07 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
"yuwang.yuwang" <yuwang.yuwang@...baba-inc.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load
balance console writes
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 23:16:16 +0100
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
> > + if (spin) {
> > + /* We spin waiting for the owner to release us */
> > + spin_acquire(&console_owner_dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
> > + /* Owner will clear console_waiter on hand off */
> > + while (!READ_ONCE(console_waiter))
>
> This should not be negated, right? We should spin while it's true, not
> false.
Ug, yes. How did that not crash in my tests.
Will fix.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists