[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq17ev772jc.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:25:11 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, subbu.seetharaman@...adcom.com,
ketan.mukadam@...adcom.com, jitendra.bhivare@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: be2iscsi: Use kasprintf
Himanshu,
>> It is not. It needs a review/ack from the driver maintainers.
>
> What about Kyle Fortin's review ?
Kyle's review is fine. But when a driver is actively maintained, like
be2iscsi is, I always give ack/nack rights to the relevant maintainers.
In this case that's Jitendra.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists