[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLAb+Jj7x8p0mizewoOHuQVqup9DxHkvgqkQFeB5cJo9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:06:15 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] arm64: use -mno-implicit-float instead of -mgeneral-regs-only
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:31:56PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 10:11:52AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
>> > From: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
>> >
>> > LLVM bug 30792 causes clang's AArch64 backend to crash compiling
>> > arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-cipher.c. Replacing -mgeneral-regs-only with
>> > -mno-implicit-float is the suggested workaround.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
>> > Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
>>
>> Just to check, what happens if you pass both to clang?
>
> Apparently not. However, we can do:
>
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mgeneral-regs-only $(lseinstr) $(brokengasinst)
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(lseinstr) $(brokengasinst)
> +# Clang workaround for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30792
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -mno-implicit-float, -mgeneral-regs-only)
Should a clang version test be included, since we know at least 5.0 is
need (with this fix)? There are distros with much earlier versions of
clang, for example...
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists