[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1509736086-408-1-git-send-email-yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2017 03:08:06 +0800
From: "Yang Shi" <yang.s@...baba-inc.com>
To: apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com
Cc: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Yang Shi" <yang.s@...baba-inc.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] scripts: checkpatch.pl: remove obsolete in_atomic rule
checkpatch.pl still reports the below in_atomic warning:
WARNING: use of in_atomic() is incorrect outside core kernel code
+ if (in_atomic())
But, in_atomic() has been used outside kernel dir for a long time, and
even drivers. So, remove the obsolete rule even though they can be
ignored.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.s@...baba-inc.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
Not sure if removing the obsolete rule is preferred by checkpatch.pl, anyway
it sounds not make sense to keep invalid rule.
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 8b80bac..e8cf94f 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6231,17 +6231,6 @@ sub process {
"Using $1 should generally have parentheses around the comparison\n" . $herecurr);
}
-# whine mightly about in_atomic
- if ($line =~ /\bin_atomic\s*\(/) {
- if ($realfile =~ m@...ivers/@) {
- ERROR("IN_ATOMIC",
- "do not use in_atomic in drivers\n" . $herecurr);
- } elsif ($realfile !~ m@...rnel/@) {
- WARN("IN_ATOMIC",
- "use of in_atomic() is incorrect outside core kernel code\n" . $herecurr);
- }
- }
-
# whine about ACCESS_ONCE
if ($^V && $^V ge 5.10.0 &&
$line =~ /\bACCESS_ONCE\s*$balanced_parens\s*(=(?!=))?\s*($FuncArg)?/) {
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists