[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJHLfYC82Ke2b5ZJyrJ4cYppoS9J285n7OXVre_bVbr8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:27:53 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
>
>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Reviewed and applied to drm-misc-next. Thanks!
Thanks!
I happened to notice that this was in next-20171102, but missing in
next-20171103. Did it get removed, or am I misunderstanding something?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists