linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Convert timers to use timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a803ruqq.fsf@anholt.net>
Date:   Fri, 03 Nov 2017 13:07:57 -0700
From:   Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
>> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
>>
>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>>
>> Reviewed and applied to drm-misc-next.  Thanks!
>
> Thanks!
>
> I happened to notice that this was in next-20171102, but missing in
> next-20171103. Did it get removed, or am I misunderstanding something?

I don't know.  It's in drm-misc-next, though, so it'll flow upstream
without my intervention.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)