linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Convert timers to use timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:39:09 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vc4: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:07:57PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
> >> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
> >>
> >>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> >>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
> >>
> >> Reviewed and applied to drm-misc-next.  Thanks!
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > I happened to notice that this was in next-20171102, but missing in
> > next-20171103. Did it get removed, or am I misunderstanding something?
> 
> I don't know.  It's in drm-misc-next, though, so it'll flow upstream
> without my intervention.

I'll make 4.16. Again, our merge cutoff is -rc6, hence why they all
missed. I guess one more to cherry-pick for you, or time to give up?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch