[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxik=Z+aSvQd8jqy3uO58G_2X+kWV_DWH1jgRGveOkz3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:46:24 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Unbreak modules that rely on external PAGE_KERNEL availability
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> So _this_ is the underlying problem:
>
> #define _PAGE_ENC (_AT(pteval_t, sme_me_mask))
>
> because that is simply not how the _PAGE_xyz macros should work!
>
> So it should have been a fixed bit to begin with, and the dynamic part
> should have been elsewhere.
Hmm. It's not an entirely new problem. We have that
"cachemode2protval()" thing, which causes he exact same thing, except
it accesses the __cachemode2pte_tbl[] array instead.
Which we also EXPORT_SYMBOL().
So I guess _PAGE_ENC isn't any worse than what we already had.
Of course, that at least doesn't trigger for the simple cases - only
_PAGE_CACHE_WP and _PAGE_NOCACHE end up triggering that
"cachemode2protval()" case.
I do wonder if we could perhaps at least try to unify these things a
bit, and export just one thing.
And maybe avoid accessing two completely different memory locasions
every time we use _PAGE_KERNEL or whatever.
But it all looks rather nasty, so for 4.14 clearly I should just apply
that trivial one-liner patch for now.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists