[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <775d3cfc-95ca-1dff-d146-64efbdd71e1f@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 12:38:05 +0530
From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: omap: Support scratch registers
On Wednesday 08 November 2017 11:57 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/11/2017 at 11:30:45 +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>>> +static int omap_rtc_scratch_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset, void *_val,
>>>>> + size_t bytes)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct omap_rtc *rtc = priv;
>>>>> + u32 *val = _val;
>>>>> + int i;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < bytes / 4; i++)
>>>>> + val[i] = rtc_readl(rtc,
>>>>> + OMAP_RTC_SCRATCH0_REG + offset + (i * 4));
>>
>> Can the offset be the Scratch register number instead of bytes offset?
>> More intuitive to me.
>>
>> So that one can request using offset as 0, 1, 2 instead of 0, 4, 8?
>>
>
> Well, the offset is coming from the nvmem core, itself getting it from
> the Linux file API (and it is in bytes). However, you have the guarantee
> that it will be aligned on a word, see:
> http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/nvmem/core.c#L88
Okay Alexandre. Thanks for clarifying. Looks good to me.
I have tested on AM437X-GP-EVM.
Regards,
Keerthy
>
>> The above can be:
>> rtc_readl(rtc, OMAP_RTC_SCRATCH0_REG + (offset + i) * 4), val[i]);
>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists