[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y3nglqyi.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:39:49 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Alex Ng <alexng@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm/memory_hotplug: make it possible to offline blocks with reserved pages
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> writes:
> On Wed 08-11-17 14:01:55, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Hyper-V balloon driver needs to hotplug memory in smaller chunks and to
>> workaround Linux's 128Mb allignment requirement so it does a trick: partly
>> populated 128Mb blocks are added and then a custom online_page_callback
>> hook checks if the particular page is 'backed' during onlining, in case it
>> is not backed it is left in Reserved state. When the host adds more pages
>> to the block we bring them online from the driver (see
>> hv_bring_pgs_online()/hv_page_online_one() in drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c).
>> Eventually the whole block becomes fully populated and we hotplug the next
>> 128Mb. This all works for quite some time already.
>
> Why does HyperV needs to workaround the section size limit in the first
> place? We are allocation memmap for the whole section anyway so it won't
> save any memory. So the whole thing sounds rather dubious to me.
>
Memory hotplug requirements in Windows are different, they have 2Mb
granularity, not 128Mb like we have in Linux x86.
Imagine there's a request to add 32Mb of memory comming from the
Hyper-V host. What can we do? Don't add anything at all and wait till
we're suggested to add > 128Mb and then add a section or the current
approach.
>> What is not working is offlining of such partly populated blocks:
>> check_pages_isolated_cb() callback will not pass with a sinle Reserved page
>> and we end up with -EBUSY. However, there's no reason to fail offlining in
>> this case: these pages are already offline, we may just skip them. Add the
>> appropriate workaround to test_pages_isolated().
>
> How do you recognize pages reserved by other users. You cannot simply
> remove them, it would just blow up.
>
I exepcted sumothing like that, thus RFC. Is there a way to detect pages
which were never onlined? E.g. it is Reserved and count == 0?
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> RFC part:
>> - Other usages of Reserved pages making offlining blocks with them a no-go
>> may exist.
>> - I'm not exactly sure that adding another parameter to
>> test_pages_isolated() is a good idea, we may go with a single flag for
>> both Reserved and HwPoisoned pages: we have just two call sites and they
>> have opposite needs (true, true in one case and false, false in the
>> other).
>> ---
>> include/linux/page-isolation.h | 2 +-
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 8 +++++++-
>> mm/page_isolation.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
>> index 05a04e603686..daba12a59574 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ undo_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
>> * Test all pages in [start_pfn, end_pfn) are isolated or not.
>> */
>> int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
>> - bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages);
>> + bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages, bool skip_reserved_pages);
>>
>> struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private,
>> int **resultp);
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index d4b5f29906b9..5b7d1482804f 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -1467,7 +1467,7 @@ check_pages_isolated_cb(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> {
>> int ret;
>> long offlined = *(long *)data;
>> - ret = test_pages_isolated(start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages, true);
>> + ret = test_pages_isolated(start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages, true, true);
>> offlined = nr_pages;
>> if (!ret)
>> *(long *)data += offlined;
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index 77e4d3c5c57b..b475928c476c 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -7632,7 +7632,7 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>> }
>>
>> /* Make sure the range is really isolated. */
>> - if (test_pages_isolated(outer_start, end, false)) {
>> + if (test_pages_isolated(outer_start, end, false, false)) {
>> pr_info_ratelimited("%s: [%lx, %lx) PFNs busy\n",
>> __func__, outer_start, end);
>> ret = -EBUSY;
>> @@ -7746,6 +7746,12 @@ __offline_isolated_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> + /* Some pages might never be online, skip them */
>> + if (unlikely(PageReserved(page))) {
>> + pfn++;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> BUG_ON(page_count(page));
>> BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page));
>> order = page_order(page);
>> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
>> index 44f213935bf6..fd9c18e00b92 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
>> @@ -233,7 +233,8 @@ int undo_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
>> */
>> static unsigned long
>> __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
>> - bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages)
>> + bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages,
>> + bool skip_reserved_pages)
>> {
>> struct page *page;
>>
>> @@ -253,6 +254,9 @@ __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
>> else if (skip_hwpoisoned_pages && PageHWPoison(page))
>> /* A HWPoisoned page cannot be also PageBuddy */
>> pfn++;
>> + else if (skip_reserved_pages && PageReserved(page))
>> + /* Skipping Reserved pages */
>> + pfn++;
>> else
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -262,7 +266,7 @@ __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
>>
>> /* Caller should ensure that requested range is in a single zone */
>> int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
>> - bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages)
>> + bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages, bool skip_reserved_pages)
>> {
>> unsigned long pfn, flags;
>> struct page *page;
>> @@ -285,7 +289,8 @@ int test_pages_isolated(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
>> zone = page_zone(page);
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
>> pfn = __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(start_pfn, end_pfn,
>> - skip_hwpoisoned_pages);
>> + skip_hwpoisoned_pages,
>> + skip_reserved_pages);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
>>
>> trace_test_pages_isolated(start_pfn, end_pfn, pfn);
>> --
>> 2.13.6
>>
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists