[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d30dd5bc-ca45-6bd9-5671-12980e1b3d8c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 12:11:01 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
moritz.lipp@...k.tugraz.at,
Daniel Gruss <daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at>,
michael.schwarz@...k.tugraz.at, richard.fellner@...dent.tugraz.at,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/30] x86, mm: do not set _PAGE_USER for init_mm page
tables
On 11/08/2017 11:52 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Dave Hansen
> <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> +
>> static inline void pmd_populate_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> pmd_t *pmd, pte_t *pte)
>> {
>> + pteval_t pgtable_flags = mm_pgtable_flags(mm);
>
> Why is "pmd_populate_kernel()" using mm_pgtable_flags(mm)?
>
> It should just use _KERNPG_TABLE unconditionally, shouldn't it?
> Nothing to do with init_mm, it's populating a _kernel_ page table
> regardless, no?
The end result is probably the same since a quick grep shows it only
ever getting called with init_mm or NULL. But, yeah, it should probably
just be _PAGE_KERNEL directly.
I'll update it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists