[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8760aj9aix.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 08:27:50 +0100
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@...il.com>
Cc: Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> writes:
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> So what's the status about the sync, should I pick the patches, and have the
>> others make it to your for-next branch ?
>
> It's been merged in l2-mtd/master (our -next branch) which is
> targeting 4.15. Unfortunately we didn't create a topic branch, which
> means you'll have to wait 4.15-rc1 before pushing patches 6 to 9 if you
> want avoid regressions. Anyway, I guess it's already too late to send
> PRs to arm-soc for 4.15.
Right, my next pull request is targetting v4.16.
Andrea, would you be so kind as to resend the serie (patches 6 - 9) on the
mailing list and to me, so that I review and apply the correct version.
Thanks.
--
Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists