[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171108085446.718a2ff5@bbrezillon>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 08:54:46 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc: Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser
On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 11:53:11 +0200
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:
>
> > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> writes:
> >
> >> Hi Robert,
> >> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on
> >> patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be
> >> wrong if you apply them), so we need to sync. What release is
> >> pxa/for-next targeting? If it's 4.15 I can apply patch 1 just after
> >> 4.14-rc1 is out and provide an immutable branch for you to pull in
> >> pxa/for-next.
> >
> > Hi Boris,
> >
> > It's targeting 4.15 right now. And we can do as you like, either an immutable
> > branch, or I wait to include these patches into my pxa/for-next until you give
> > me your go, it's as you like.
>
> Hi Boris,
>
> So what's the status about the sync, should I pick the patches, and have the
> others make it to your for-next branch ?
It's been merged in l2-mtd/master (our -next branch) which is
targeting 4.15. Unfortunately we didn't create a topic branch, which
means you'll have to wait 4.15-rc1 before pushing patches 6 to 9 if you
want avoid regressions. Anyway, I guess it's already too late to send
PRs to arm-soc for 4.15.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists