[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h7euzg768.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:58:23 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...il.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ALSA: usb: initial USB Audio Device Class 3.0 support
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:33:44 +0100,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:16:52AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:04:58 +0100,
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:38:35PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 03:01:20 +0100,
> > > > Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Recently released USB Audio Class 3.0 specification
> > > > > introduces many significant changes comparing to
> > > > > previous versions, like
> > > > > - new Power Domains, support for LPM/L1
> > > > > - new Cluster descriptor
> > > > > - changed layout of all class-specific descriptors
> > > > > - new High Capability descriptors
> > > > > - New class-specific String descriptors
> > > > > - new and removed units
> > > > > - additional sources for interrupts
> > > > > - removed Type II Audio Data Formats
> > > > > - ... and many other things (check spec)
> > > > >
> > > > > It also provides backward compatibility through
> > > > > multiple configurations, as well as requires
> > > > > mandatory support for BADD (Basic Audio Device
> > > > > Definition) on each ADC3.0 compliant device
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch adds initial support of UAC3 specification
> > > > > that is enough for Generic I/O Profile (BAOF, BAIF)
> > > > > device support from BADD document.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > The patch looks good, but the timing is fairly late for merging to
> > > > 4.15.
> > >
> > > Isn't kbuild barfing all over these? Is that because of the cross-tree
> > > changes needed?
> >
> > No, it's just local to the audio driver, plus a few
> > include/linux/usb/*.h modification / addition.
> > So there shouldn't be a big breakage in that regard.
> >
> >
> > > > So from my side, the primary question is whether the changes in USB
> > > > (audio) header files are OK for USB guys.
> > > >
> > > > Greg, could you check these changes and give an ack if it's OK to
> > > > merge? Or if you prefer postpone, just let me know.
> > >
> > > I don't object to the USB header changes, as long as the fixes you point
> > > out are made :)
> >
> > Good to hear.
> > Could you give your acked-by once after reviewing the patch?
>
> I'm guessing there will be a new patch? I'll be glad to review that
> one.
Sure, no problem.
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists