lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2017 21:14:16 +0000
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Mark <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Takashi <tiwai@...e.de>,
        Pierre <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
        Shreyas NC <shreyas.nc@...el.com>, patches.audio@...el.com,
        alan@...ux.intel.com,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>, plai@...eaurora.org,
        Sudheer Papothi <spapothi@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] soundwire: Add Master registration



On 19/10/17 04:03, Vinod Koul wrote:

> +/**
> + * sdw_add_bus_master: add a bus Master instance
> + *
> + * @bus: bus instance
> + *
> + * Initializes the bus instance, read properties and create child
> + * devices.
> + */

Some of the exported functions are missing kerneldocs.
Is it something you plan to add in next version of the patcheset?

> +int sdw_add_bus_master(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!bus->dev) {
> +		pr_err("SoundWire bus has no device");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_init(&bus->bus_lock);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bus->slaves);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * SDW is an enumerable bus, but devices can be powered off. So,
> +	 * they won't be able to report as present.
> +	 *
> +	 * Create Slave devices based on Slaves described in
> +	 * the respective firmware (ACPI/DT)
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && bus->dev && ACPI_HANDLE(bus->dev))
> +		ret = sdw_acpi_find_slaves(bus);
> +	else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && bus->dev && bus->dev->of_node)
> +		ret = sdw_of_find_slaves(bus);
> +	else
bus->dev is already checked in the start of the function, do we need to 
check once again ?

> +		ret = -ENOTSUPP; /* No ACPI/DT so error out */
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(bus->dev, "Finding slaves failed:%d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sdw_add_bus_master);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists