[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5A04F184.3000204@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:23:32 +0900
From: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@...il.com>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
CC: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com,
Hyunchul Lee <cheol.lee@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] apply write hints to select the type of segments
Hello, Chao
On 11/09/2017 06:12 PM, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/11/9 13:51, Hyunchul Lee wrote:
>> From: Hyunchul Lee <cheol.lee@....com>
>>
>> Using write hints[1], applications can inform the life time of the data
>> written to devices. and this[2] reported that the write hints patch
>> decreased writes in NAND by 25%.
>>
>> This hints help F2FS to determine the followings.
>> 1) the segment types where the data will be written.
>> 2) the hints that will be passed down to devices with the data of segments.
>>
>> This patch set implements the first mapping from write hints to segment types
>> as shown below.
>>
>> hints segment type
>> ----- ------------
>> WRITE_LIFE_SHORT CURSEG_COLD_DATA
>> WRITE_LIFE_EXTREME CURSEG_HOT_DATA
>> others CURSEG_WARM_DATA
>>
>> The F2FS poliy for hot/cold seperation has precedence over this hints, And
>> hints are not applied in in-place update.
>
> Could we change to disable IPU if file/inode write hint is existing?
>
I am afraid that this makes side effects. for example, this could cause
out-of-place updates even when there are not enough free segments.
I can write the patch that handles these situations. But I wonder
that this is required, and I am not sure which IPU polices can be disabled.
>>
>> Before the second mapping is implemented, write hints are not passed down
>> to devices. Because it is better that the data of a segment have the same
>> hint.
>>
>> [1]: c75b1d9421f80f4143e389d2d50ddfc8a28c8c35
>> [2]: https://lwn.net/Articles/726477/
>
> Could you write a patch to support passing write hint to block layer for
> buffered writes as below commit:
> 0127251c45ae ("ext4: add support for passing in write hints for buffered writes")
>
Sure I will. I wrote it already ;)
I think that datas from the same segment should be passed down with the same
hint, and the following mapping is reasonable. I wonder what is your opinion
about it.
segment type hints
------------ -----
CURSEG_COLD_DATA WRITE_LIFE_EXTREME
CURSEG_HOT_DATA WRITE_LIFE_SHORT
CURSEG_COLD_NODE WRITE_LIFE_NORMAL
CURSEG_HOT_NODE WRITE_LIFE_MEDIUM
others WRITE_LIFE_NONE
> Thanks,
>
>>
>> Hyunchul Lee (2):
>> f2fs: apply write hints to select the type of segments for buffered
>> write
>> f2fs: apply write hints to select the type of segment for direct write
>>
>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 14 +++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>
>
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists