[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d305845e-d971-553b-ad95-afc321c131b6@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:31:14 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@...il.com>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@....com>,
Hyunchul Lee <cheol.lee@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] apply write hints to select the type of segments
On 2017/11/10 2:16, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 11/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/11/9 13:51, Hyunchul Lee wrote:
>>> From: Hyunchul Lee <cheol.lee@....com>
>>>
>>> Using write hints[1], applications can inform the life time of the data
>>> written to devices. and this[2] reported that the write hints patch
>>> decreased writes in NAND by 25%.
>>>
>>> This hints help F2FS to determine the followings.
>>> 1) the segment types where the data will be written.
>>> 2) the hints that will be passed down to devices with the data of segments.
>>>
>>> This patch set implements the first mapping from write hints to segment types
>>> as shown below.
>>>
>>> hints segment type
>>> ----- ------------
>>> WRITE_LIFE_SHORT CURSEG_COLD_DATA
>>> WRITE_LIFE_EXTREME CURSEG_HOT_DATA
>>> others CURSEG_WARM_DATA
>>>
>>> The F2FS poliy for hot/cold seperation has precedence over this hints, And
>>> hints are not applied in in-place update.
>>
>> Could we change to disable IPU if file/inode write hint is existing?
>
> Well, this is a hint which is not related to IPU. I think user should be aware
> of controlling IPU.
Yes, no matter filesystem trigger IPU or OPU, in FTL, old PPA will always become
invalid (life is end), FTL only cares about how long PPA will become invalid
instead of how LPA/PPA mapps. So from FTL aspect, it's no problem. :)
But from f2fs space management aspect, IPU method can make effect of hot/cold
separating strategy becoming worse, e.g. if we trigger IPU for some hot datas,
data migration in hot segment can be postponed, result in high usage of hot
segment, leaving more work to GC.
So there is a trade-off in between reducing node writes in fsync and reduce GC
work with better hot/cold separating...
Thanks,
>
>>>
>>> Before the second mapping is implemented, write hints are not passed down
>>> to devices. Because it is better that the data of a segment have the same
>>> hint.
>>>
>>> [1]: c75b1d9421f80f4143e389d2d50ddfc8a28c8c35
>>> [2]: https://lwn.net/Articles/726477/
>>
>> Could you write a patch to support passing write hint to block layer for
>> buffered writes as below commit:
>> 0127251c45ae ("ext4: add support for passing in write hints for buffered writes")
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Hyunchul Lee (2):
>>> f2fs: apply write hints to select the type of segments for buffered
>>> write
>>> f2fs: apply write hints to select the type of segment for direct write
>>>
>>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 14 +++++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists