[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171110180931.xhhi35osclzceba2@agluck-desk>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:09:32 -0800
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] symbol lookup: introduce
dereference_symbol_descriptor()
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:48:29AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> -Examples::
> -
> - printk("Going to call: %pF\n", gettimeofday);
> - printk("Going to call: %pF\n", p->func);
> - printk("%s: called from %pS\n", __func__, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> - printk("%s: called from %pS\n", __func__,
> - (void *)__builtin_return_address(0));
> - printk("Faulted at %pS\n", (void *)regs->ip);
> - printk(" %s%pB\n", (reliable ? "" : "? "), (void *)*stack);
Did you mean to delete the Examples completely? Wouldn't it
be better to just update (s/%pF/%pS/g)?
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists