[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171110181114.x22y2zr5qdf4y5za@agluck-desk>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:11:15 -0800
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate
%pF/%pf printk specifiers
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:48:24AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been
> reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it
> once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in
> advance.
You can add back the:
Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> #ia64
Apart from my comment about dropping the Examples from the
Documentation the series looks OK to me.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists