[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171114232355.vjxlzfbqbqj5ihq4@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:23:55 -0800
From: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
guro@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] blkcg: account requests instead of bios for request
based request_queues
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 02:26:12PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> blkcg accounting is currently bio based, which is silly for request
> based request_queues. This is silly as the number of bios doesn't
> have much to do with the actual number of IOs issued to the underlying
> device (can be significantly higher or lower) and may change depending
> on the implementation details on how the bios are issued (e.g. from
> the recent split-bios-while-issuing change).
>
> request based request_queues have QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT set by default
> which controls the gendisk accounting. Do cgroup accounting for those
> request_queues together with gendisk accounting on request completion.
>
> This makes cgroup accounting consistent with gendisk accounting and
> what's happening on the system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 048be4a..ad23b96 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -2429,6 +2429,7 @@ void blk_account_io_completion(struct request *req, unsigned int bytes)
> cpu = part_stat_lock();
> part = req->part;
> part_stat_add(cpu, part, sectors[rw], bytes >> 9);
> + blkcg_account_io_completion(req, bytes);
> part_stat_unlock();
> }
> }
> @@ -2454,6 +2455,8 @@ void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req)
> part_round_stats(req->q, cpu, part);
> part_dec_in_flight(req->q, part, rw);
>
> + blkcg_account_io_done(req);
> +
> hd_struct_put(part);
> part_stat_unlock();
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h b/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
> index 96eed0f..f2f9691 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
> @@ -715,7 +715,8 @@ static inline bool blkcg_bio_issue_check(struct request_queue *q,
>
> throtl = blk_throtl_bio(q, blkg, bio);
>
> - if (!throtl) {
> + /* if @q does io stat, blkcg stats are updated together with them */
> + if (!blk_queue_io_stat(q) && !throtl) {
Reviewed-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
One nitpick, can we use q->request_fn to determine request based queue? I think
that is more reliable and usual way for this.
Thanks,
Shaohua
> blkg_rwstat_add(&blkg->stat_bytes, bio->bi_opf,
> bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
> blkg_rwstat_add(&blkg->stat_ios, bio->bi_opf, 1);
> @@ -764,6 +765,17 @@ static inline void blk_rq_disassociate_blkg(struct request *rq)
> rq->blkg = NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline void blkcg_account_io_completion(struct request *rq,
> + unsigned int bytes)
> +{
> + blkg_rwstat_add(&rq->blkg->stat_bytes, rq_data_dir(rq), bytes);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blkcg_account_io_done(struct request *rq)
> +{
> + blkg_rwstat_add(&rq->blkg->stat_ios, rq_data_dir(rq), 1);
> +}
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP */
>
> struct blkcg {
> @@ -823,6 +835,10 @@ static inline bool blkcg_bio_issue_check(struct request_queue *q,
> static inline void blk_rq_associate_blkg(struct request *rq, struct blkcg *blkcg) { }
> static inline void blk_rq_disassociate_blkg(struct request *rq) { }
>
> +static inline void blkcg_account_io_completion(struct request *rq,
> + unsigned int bytes) { }
> +static inline void blkcg_account_io_done(struct request *rq) { }
> +
> #define blk_queue_for_each_rl(rl, q) \
> for ((rl) = &(q)->root_rl; (rl); (rl) = NULL)
>
> --
> 2.9.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists