[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171115171118.GV983427@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:11:18 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
guro@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] blkcg: associate a request with its blkcg_gq
instead of request_list
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:17:43PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> After patch 5, we don't really need the blk_put_rl, blk_get_rl, blk_rq_set_rl
> functions. I'd like to delete them and only keep blk_rq_rl. The name
> blk_rq_set_rl is confusing too.
Yeah, we can switch the legacy rq to switch to direct blkg pinning
too. If that cleans up the code, great.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists