[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR21MB084523580162E4BFCB56CDD3CB290@MWHPR21MB0845.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:24:15 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC] lib: simplify bitmap_from_u32array API
I certainly approve. The name sucks too 😉
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
> * bitmap_find_free_region(bitmap, bits, order) Find and allocate bit region
> * bitmap_release_region(bitmap, pos, order) Free specified bit region
> * bitmap_allocate_region(bitmap, pos, order) Allocate specified bit region
> - * bitmap_from_u32array(dst, nbits, buf, nwords) *dst = *buf (nwords 32b
> words)
> + * bitmap_from_u32array(dst, buf, nbits) *dst = *buf (nwords 32b
> words)
I think this should read:
+ * bitmap_from_u32array(dst, buf, bits) Copy 'bits' from buf to dst
Also, on LE systems, shouldn't we just use memcpy() for the first bits/8 bytes?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists