linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.13 13/44] packet: avoid panic in packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:42:37 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 13/44] packet: avoid panic in packet_getsockopt()

4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>


[ Upstream commit 509c7a1ecc8601f94ffba8a00889fefb239c00c6 ]

syzkaller got crashes in packet_getsockopt() processing
PACKET_ROLLOVER_STATS command while another thread was managing
to change po->rollover

Using RCU will fix this bug. We might later add proper RCU annotations
for sparse sake.

In v2: I replaced kfree(rollover) in fanout_add() to kfree_rcu()
variant, as spotted by John.

Fixes: a9b6391814d5 ("packet: rollover statistics")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/packet/af_packet.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1771,7 +1771,7 @@ static int fanout_add(struct sock *sk, u
 
 out:
 	if (err && rollover) {
-		kfree(rollover);
+		kfree_rcu(rollover, rcu);
 		po->rollover = NULL;
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&fanout_mutex);
@@ -1798,8 +1798,10 @@ static struct packet_fanout *fanout_rele
 		else
 			f = NULL;
 
-		if (po->rollover)
+		if (po->rollover) {
 			kfree_rcu(po->rollover, rcu);
+			po->rollover = NULL;
+		}
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&fanout_mutex);
 
@@ -3853,6 +3855,7 @@ static int packet_getsockopt(struct sock
 	void *data = &val;
 	union tpacket_stats_u st;
 	struct tpacket_rollover_stats rstats;
+	struct packet_rollover *rollover;
 
 	if (level != SOL_PACKET)
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
@@ -3931,13 +3934,18 @@ static int packet_getsockopt(struct sock
 		       0);
 		break;
 	case PACKET_ROLLOVER_STATS:
-		if (!po->rollover)
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		rollover = rcu_dereference(po->rollover);
+		if (rollover) {
+			rstats.tp_all = atomic_long_read(&rollover->num);
+			rstats.tp_huge = atomic_long_read(&rollover->num_huge);
+			rstats.tp_failed = atomic_long_read(&rollover->num_failed);
+			data = &rstats;
+			lv = sizeof(rstats);
+		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		if (!rollover)
 			return -EINVAL;
-		rstats.tp_all = atomic_long_read(&po->rollover->num);
-		rstats.tp_huge = atomic_long_read(&po->rollover->num_huge);
-		rstats.tp_failed = atomic_long_read(&po->rollover->num_failed);
-		data = &rstats;
-		lv = sizeof(rstats);
 		break;
 	case PACKET_TX_HAS_OFF:
 		val = po->tp_tx_has_off;