linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 2/3] ARM: SoC driver updates for 4.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:55:38 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        Vladimir Barinov <vladimir.barinov@...entembedded.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/3] ARM: SoC driver updates for 4.15

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> Regarding this pull request 2/3, would you prefer
>
> a) pulling it after 3/3, thereby getting a bisection problem
>     but having contents that are otherwise tested in combination

Gaah. I'll do that. You guys have been good for so long that a
one-time mistake isn't worth worrying about.

But please do make sure that your infrastructure actually checks the
branches individually in the future. Particularly since I only do the
x86-64 build, so I obviously inevitably miss a lot of potential
problems in the ARM SoC branches.

               Linus