[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0041277a-f580-1c35-7a6b-5154e676e82f@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 22:28:03 +0100
From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, arndbergmann@...il.com
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board
Hello Lukasz!
On 17/11/17 00:22, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being
> a derivative of TS72XX design.
>
> This patchset consists of following patches:
>
> - ts72xx.[c|h] cosmetic cleanup/improvement
> - Move the common code for ts72xx and BK3 to ts72xx-common.c - this
> code can be reused by other designs build around ts72xx
> - The Liebherr's BK3 board has been added with re-using code of
> ts72xx.c
>
> Lukasz Majewski (4):
> ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Use DEFINE_RES_MEM macros where applicable
The patch 3/4 deletes everything added by patch 1/4, so I don't really see the point of it.
> ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Provide include guards for ts72xx.h file
> ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Exclude reusable part of the ts72xx board
> ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board - ts72xx derivative
I tend to agree with Hartley, if you'd just add all BK3-related extras to ts72xx.c it would
be less than 60 LoCs, you probably even do not need new Kconfig options.
Alex.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists