[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171120152300.6d058999@alans-desktop>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:23:00 +0000
From: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, vinod.koul@...el.com,
liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] ASoC: Intel: Kconfig: Simplify-clarify ACPI/PCI
dependencies
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:01:57 -0600
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> PCI/ACPI selections should not happen in Kconfig for machine drivers,
> move to SOC selections.
>
> Add distinction between PCI and ACPI HiFi2 platforms. The PCI-based
> platforms may be removed at some point since Medfield is not really
> supported by anyone and there is no publicly available firmware for
> Merrifield.
Merrifield is (Intel secret decoder ring translation - 'Edison')
I don't thionk anyone would care if Medfield and Moorestown kicked the
bucket upstream however. Moorestown wouldn't make much difference
code-wise as it has a 'real computer' twin (Oaktrail), but dumping the
Medfield code would be IMHO fine.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists