[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c0db712-ed68-35ce-d50a-0a4557b42ef1@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:18:01 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, arnd@...db.de, vinod.koul@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com,
broonie@...nel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/7] ASoC: Intel: Fix Kconfig
On 11/18/2017 10:49 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 01:01:56 +0100,
> Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> +if SND_SOC_INTEL_BAYTRAIL
>>
>> config SND_SOC_INTEL_BYT_MAX98090_MACH
>> tristate "ASoC Audio driver for Intel Baytrail with MAX98090 codec"
>> + default n
> default=n is superfluous, can be dropped.
>
>> depends on X86_INTEL_LPSS && I2C
>> - depends on SND_SST_IPC_ACPI = n
>> - depends on SND_SOC_INTEL_BAYTRAIL
>> select SND_SOC_MAX98090
> So the dependency on ND_SST_IPC_ACPI=n is removed here too, and I
> guess this will allow this machine driver built although it shouldn't
> be?
This dependency doesn't really make sense any longer at the machine
driver level. There is now an explicit layer on the platform side
(SND_SOC_INTEL_BAYTRAIL) where the exclusion with SND_SOC_INTEL_HIFI2
platforms should be handled.
I also removed this dependency because it was 'one way', I couldn't find
a way to show explicit mutual exclusions without getting into circular
dependencies.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@...a-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists