[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3daea226-c5cb-62e7-a025-8f758712a81a@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:19:39 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpupower: Combine two condition checks into one statement in
get_cpu_topology()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:10:14 +0100
The same assignments were used in an if branch of two separate statements.
* Merge their condition checks into a single statement instead.
* Adjust the indentation there.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c | 18 ++++++------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c b/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c
index 9c395ec924de..81c828e5920e 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c
@@ -140,18 +140,12 @@ int get_cpu_topology(struct cpupower_topology *cpu_top)
for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpus; cpu++) {
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].cpu = cpu;
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].is_online = cpupower_is_cpu_online(cpu);
- if(sysfs_topology_read_file(
- cpu,
- "physical_package_id",
- &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg)) < 0) {
- cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg = -1;
- cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core = -1;
- continue;
- }
- if(sysfs_topology_read_file(
- cpu,
- "core_id",
- &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core)) < 0) {
+ if (sysfs_topology_read_file(cpu, "physical_package_id",
+ &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg))
+ < 0 ||
+ sysfs_topology_read_file(cpu, "core_id",
+ &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core))
+ < 0) {
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg = -1;
cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core = -1;
continue;
--
2.15.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists