linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] intel_ips: Convert timers to use timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2017 11:45:23 -0800
From:   Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_ips: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 05:30:48PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> >> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >>>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> >>>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. Moves timer structure off stack and
> >>>> into struct ips_driver.
> >>>
> >>> Pushed to my testing queue, thanks!
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I don't see this in -next yet. Should the tip tree carry this conversion?
> >
> > I thought it was a result of discussion since we lack of patch that
> > brought the core change.
> >
> > However, because I merged Wolfram's immutable branch in order to apply
> > Hans' fix, I can carry your patch as well.
> >
> > Either would be fine with me.
> >
> > Going ahead, I applied it to my review and testing queue, thanks!
> 
> Hi again!
> 
> I'm just checking on this patch -- I haven't seen it in a pull request
> to Linus yet (for the merge window he's threatened will be small).
> This is one of the remaining conversion patches I need in v4.15. Is
> this still planned to be merged for v4.15?

Hi Kees,

It went out the day after your note above in the platform-drivers-x86-v4.15-1
pull request. We're working through some issues with this pull request with
Linus now, but yes, it will make 4.15.

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center