[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXHpgkwRMM3WhW97YtDas2Yk+75rkJ=h1dPTveBp=3Lxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 08:05:02 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/entry: Fix assumptions that the HW TSS is at the
beginning of cpu_tss
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Could you please do a delta to the very latest WIP.x86/mm instead?
>>
>> In the latest I have included the review tags already, and all the easy-to-do
>> review feedback as well, so the delta should be rasonably small.
>>
>> These entry bits are destined for x86/urgent real soon, so Thomas and me are
>> trying to pin the tree down and do delta changes only.
>>
>> If it's a simple full interdiff between your latest and WIP.x86/mm that's fine as
>> well, can backmerge everything accordingly.
>
> Also feel free to include the two unwinder enhancements from you and Josh in the
> delta series (as two separate patches) - WIP.x86/mm won't change more today.
I can do that. Or if you want to get testing going, you can just pick
them up -- I'm not planning on touching either one of of them.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists