lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:43:38 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/entry: Fix assumptions that the HW TSS is at the beginning of cpu_tss * Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote: > > > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote: > > > >> Could you please do a delta to the very latest WIP.x86/mm instead? > >> > >> In the latest I have included the review tags already, and all the easy-to-do > >> review feedback as well, so the delta should be rasonably small. > >> > >> These entry bits are destined for x86/urgent real soon, so Thomas and me are > >> trying to pin the tree down and do delta changes only. > >> > >> If it's a simple full interdiff between your latest and WIP.x86/mm that's fine as > >> well, can backmerge everything accordingly. > > > > Also feel free to include the two unwinder enhancements from you and Josh in the > > delta series (as two separate patches) - WIP.x86/mm won't change more today. > > I can do that. Or if you want to get testing going, you can just pick > them up -- I'm not planning on touching either one of of them. I was hoping for proper changelogs and SOBs for both of them ;-) Thanks, Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists