linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Add a warning for log messages that don't end in a new line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:42:48 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Add a warning for log messages that don't
 end in a new line



On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Julia Lawall wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 19:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > I just assume that a printk that has no KERN_ is adding a
> > > newline, which is my understanding of Joe's comment.
> >
> > More precisely:
> >
> > Any printk without an initial KERN_CONT prepends a newline
> > if the last printk content char emitted that is not part
> > of a printk timestamp/header was not a newline.
>
> Ah, I misunderstood.  I thought it was any printk that has no KERN
> indicator at all.  That I can fix.

Although I guess that in that case the whole exercise is pointless?
Because every print will at runtime be followed by another print, which
will add either the newline or a continuation.

julia