[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171127135032.GF19413@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:50:32 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Richard Leitner <dev@...l1n.net>
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, richard.leitner@...data.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: phy: harmonize phy_id{,_mask} data type
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:16:45AM +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
> From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...data.com>
>
> Previously phy_id was u32 and phy_id_mask was unsigned int. As the
> phy_id_mask defines the important bits of the phy_id (and is therefore
> the same size) these two variables should be the same data type.
Hi Richard
It is normal to put inside the [] of the subject line which of the two
trees this patch is for. In this case net-next.
No need to resend, but please try to do this for your the next
networking patch.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists