lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:50:55 +0100
From:   Richard Leitner <>
To:     Andrew Lunn <>, Richard Leitner <>
CC:     <>, <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] net: phy: harmonize phy_id{,_mask} data type

On 11/27/2017 02:50 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:16:45AM +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
>> From: Richard Leitner <>
>> Previously phy_id was u32 and phy_id_mask was unsigned int. As the
>> phy_id_mask defines the important bits of the phy_id (and is therefore
>> the same size) these two variables should be the same data type.
> Hi Richard
> It is normal to put inside the [] of the subject line which of the two
> trees this patch is for. In this case net-next.
> No need to resend, but please try to do this for your the next
> networking patch.

Ok. Thank you for the information. Just saw that it's described in
netdev-FAQ.txt. Sorry for not reading that in advance!

> 	   Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists