linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] drm/sun4i: Add A83t LVDS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2681268.ePd4u43rOS@jernej-laptop>
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:20:52 +0100
From:   Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        plaes@...es.org, icenowy@...c.io,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] drm/sun4i: Add A83t LVDS support

Hi,

Dne ponedeljek, 27. november 2017 ob 16:41:24 CET je Maxime Ripard napisal(a):
> Hi,
> 
> Here is an attempt at supporting the LVDS output in our DRM driver. This
> has been tested on the A83T (with DE2), but since everything is basically
> in the TCON, it should also be usable on the older SoCs with minor
> modifications.
> 
> This was the occasion to refactor a bunch of things. The most notable ones
> would be the documentation, and split of the UI layers in the mixer code,

I'm just about to send my series of patches which would add full support for 
UI and VI planes (multi planes, HW scaling, all color formats). It would clash 
with your patches 6, 7 and 8.

Preview of my work as a single patch can be seen here:
https://github.com/jernejsk/linux-1/commit/
8fdef3b510b567bfe81c87b0c3e73ddcf4f5b711

How would you like to handle that? Some changes are similar, but I don't see a 
point rebasing my patches atop of yours.

Since I'm almost done, I will just send them and we can discuss them then.

Best regards,
Jernej

> and the switch to kfifo for our endpoint parsing code in the driver that
> fixes an issue introduced by the switch to BFS.
> 
> Let me know what you think,
> Maxime