[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdm+65Fx1gLZR3h7Vz-Ma4DNWR4W=cOL8KpKZXMgN-nCLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:15:50 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Matveev <alxmtvv@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix missing 'const' qualifiers
Checked call sites, looks like no one tries to modify these pointers.
I too prefer to make things as const as possible, though I recently
had a coworker refer to the propagation of const in a code base as a
"Gordian knot," which I thought was eloquent.
checkpatch mentions that there's one line that's over 80 chars, and
that there's M$ DOS style line endings (but that may just be my client
gmail, or yours (exchange?)). If you fix up that long line, then:
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists