[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b5a64f1-9979-ae56-99f8-72c3802a9c60@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:15:33 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at,
hughd@...gle.com, keescook@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
michael.schwarz@...k.tugraz.at, moritz.lipp@...k.tugraz.at,
richard.fellner@...dent.tugraz.at
Subject: Re: [patch V2 2/5] x86/kaiser: Simplify disabling of global pages
On 11/26/2017 03:14 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +static void enable_global_pages(void)
> +{
> +#ifndef CONFIG_KAISER
> + __supported_pte_mask |= _PAGE_GLOBAL;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static void __init probe_page_size_mask(void)
> {
> /*
> @@ -179,11 +186,11 @@ static void __init probe_page_size_mask(
> cr4_set_bits_and_update_boot(X86_CR4_PSE);
>
> /* Enable PGE if available */
> + __supported_pte_mask |= _PAGE_GLOBAL;
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PGE)) {
> cr4_set_bits_and_update_boot(X86_CR4_PGE);
> - __supported_pte_mask |= _PAGE_GLOBAL;
> - } else
> - __supported_pte_mask &= ~_PAGE_GLOBAL;
> + enable_global_pages();
> + }
This looks a little funky. Doesn't this or _PAGE_GLOBAL into
__supported_pte_mask twice? Once before the if(), and then a second
time via enable_global_pages() inside the if?
Did you intend for it to be masked *out* in the first one and then or'd
back in via enable_global_pages()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists