[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171128130737.cpohndeskuczcpa7@flea.home>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:07:37 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
Cc: Thomas van Kleef <thomas@...sch.nl>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Andreas Baierl <list@...reisrum.de>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
linux@...linux.org.uk, wens@...e.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Cedrus driver
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Il giorno 28 nov 2017, alle ore 13:52, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:54:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> >>>>> Should I be working in sunxi-next I wonder?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, this is the best way, cedrus is very specific to sunxi.
> >>>> So before working on mainline, I think the best is to work un sunxi-next branch.
> >>>
> >>> Is the requests2 api in sunxi-next?
> >>
> >> It should be there,
> >> take a look at latest commit of yesterday:
> >> https://github.com/linux-sunxi/linux-sunxi/commit/df7cacd062cd84c551d7e72f15b1af6d71abc198
> >
> > No, it shouldn't. sunxi-next is about patches that are related to
> > sunxi that have been accepted in their respective maintainers'
> > branches.
> >
> > While we could argue about the first criteria, the second one is not
> > respected.
> >
> > And really, just develop against 4.14. sunxi-next is rebased, and it's
> > just not something you can base some work on.
>
> Where do we can work on then?
> Should Thomas setup his own github repo?
> What about the one you’ve set up @free-electrons?
I already said that, please make pull requests to that repo.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists