lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171128130737.cpohndeskuczcpa7@flea.home>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:07:37 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
Cc:     Thomas van Kleef <thomas@...sch.nl>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Andreas Baierl <list@...reisrum.de>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, wens@...e.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Cedrus driver

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > Il giorno 28 nov 2017, alle ore 13:52, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> ha scritto:
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:54:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> >>>>> Should I be working in sunxi-next I wonder?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Yes, this is the best way, cedrus is very specific to sunxi.
> >>>> So before working on mainline, I think the best is to work un sunxi-next branch.
> >>> 
> >>> Is the requests2 api in sunxi-next?
> >> 
> >> It should be there,
> >> take a look at latest commit of yesterday:
> >> https://github.com/linux-sunxi/linux-sunxi/commit/df7cacd062cd84c551d7e72f15b1af6d71abc198
> > 
> > No, it shouldn't. sunxi-next is about patches that are related to
> > sunxi that have been accepted in their respective maintainers'
> > branches.
> > 
> > While we could argue about the first criteria, the second one is not
> > respected.
> > 
> > And really, just develop against 4.14. sunxi-next is rebased, and it's
> > just not something you can base some work on.
> 
> Where do we can work on then?
> Should Thomas setup his own github repo?
> What about the one you’ve set up @free-electrons?

I already said that, please make pull requests to that repo.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ