[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171128154710.ytqixlioc3hrcbl3@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:47:10 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate
%pF/%pf printk specifiers
On Fri 2017-11-10 08:48:24, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A reworked version. There is a new dereference_symbol_descriptor()
> function now, where "the magic happens", so I don't touch kallsyms_lookup()
> and module_address_lookup() anymore.
The new version looks good to me. Thanks a lot for reworking it.
I feel much better now. For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been
> reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it
> once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in
> advance.
I see that it was tested on all affected architectures. Thanks a lot
all testers.
It seems that we are ready to go. I am going to push this into
for-4.16 branch in printk.git.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists