lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:24:58 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate
 %pF/%pf printk specifiers

On (11/28/17 16:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2017-11-10 08:48:24, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > 	Hello,
> > 
> > 	A reworked version. There is a new dereference_symbol_descriptor()
> > function now, where "the magic happens", so I don't touch kallsyms_lookup()
> > and module_address_lookup() anymore.
> 
> The new version looks good to me. Thanks a lot for reworking it.
> I feel much better now. For the whole series:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> 
> > 	All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been
> > reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it
> > once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in
> > advance.
> 
> I see that it was tested on all affected architectures. Thanks a lot
> all testers.
> 
> It seems that we are ready to go. I am going to push this into
> for-4.16 branch in printk.git.

thanks.

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists