[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171128231959.GU8052@flint.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 23:19:59 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk@...linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm tree
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:16:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> After merging the arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:233: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:285: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:286: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:365: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
>
> And many more similar.
>
> Presumably introduced by commit
>
> cabcafe5d1a5 ("ARM: 8723/1: always assume the "unified" syntax for assembly code")
Nicolas, was your patch tested? Is this another binutils weirdness?
Stephen, which binutils version are you using?
Thanks.
--
Russell King
ARM architecture Linux Kernel maintainer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists