linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171128233119.GA19925@flint.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 23:31:19 +0000
From:   Russell King <rmk@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm tree

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:16:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> After merging the arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
> 
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:233: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:285: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:286: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:365: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> 
> And many more similar.
> 
> Presumably introduced by commit
> 
>   cabcafe5d1a5 ("ARM: 8723/1: always assume the "unified" syntax for assembly code")

Well, I seem to be missing all results from the various kernel build
systems, so I've no idea what's going on with those - although kernelci
has sent me boot results with no build results... our test systems
seem to be unreliable.

Dropping Nicolas' commit, there's obviously something wrong with it
somewhere.  Nicolas, can you reproduce these problems?

-- 
Russell King
ARM architecture Linux Kernel maintainer