lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2017 23:31:19 +0000
From:   Russell King <rmk@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm tree

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:16:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> After merging the arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
> 
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:233: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:285: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:286: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:365: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> 
> And many more similar.
> 
> Presumably introduced by commit
> 
>   cabcafe5d1a5 ("ARM: 8723/1: always assume the "unified" syntax for assembly code")

Well, I seem to be missing all results from the various kernel build
systems, so I've no idea what's going on with those - although kernelci
has sent me boot results with no build results... our test systems
seem to be unreliable.

Dropping Nicolas' commit, there's obviously something wrong with it
somewhere.  Nicolas, can you reproduce these problems?

-- 
Russell King
ARM architecture Linux Kernel maintainer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ