[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171129212343.23167-4-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:23:43 +0100
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@...zon.de>,
KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: simplify kvm_mwait_in_guest()
If Intel/AMD implements MWAIT, we expect that it works well and only
reject known bugs; no reason to do it the other way around for minor
vendors. (Not that they are relevant ATM.)
This allows further simplification of kvm_mwait_in_guest().
And use boot_cpu_has() instead of "cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data," while at it.
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
index d15859ec5e92..c69f973111cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
@@ -265,18 +265,8 @@ static inline u64 nsec_to_cycles(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 nsec)
static inline bool kvm_mwait_in_guest(void)
{
- if (!cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
- return false;
-
- switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
- case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
- /* All AMD CPUs have a working MWAIT implementation */
- return true;
- case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
- return !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR);
- default:
- return false;
- }
+ return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) &&
+ !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR);
}
#endif
--
2.14.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists