[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171130131203.qyfmwipazzk4yzvx@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:12:04 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@...zon.de>,
KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86: kvm_mwait_in_guest() cleanup
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:23:40PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> This is a rebased version of an old series that simplified
> kvm_mwait_in_guest: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg149238.html
>
> AMD errata 400 patch was dropped thanks to Boris's review;
> [2/3] got an expanded commit message and I didn't include Alexander's
> r-b since the context changed when we didn't drop support for ancient
> CPUs.
>
> Radim Krčmář (3):
> KVM: x86: prevent MWAIT in guest with buggy MONITOR
> KVM: x86: drop bogus MWAIT check
> KVM: x86: simplify kvm_mwait_in_guest()
>
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 32 ++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
Looks ok to me, AFAICT. So FWIW:
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists