lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:22:34 +1100
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:     Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
        syzbot 
        <bot+3401d9494b9380f7244bcc7fec49680878fccba6@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - wait for data at beginning of recvmsg

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:17:26AM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
>
> @@ -111,6 +111,12 @@ static int _aead_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>  	size_t usedpages = 0;		/* [in]  RX bufs to be used from user */
>  	size_t processed = 0;		/* [in]  TX bufs to be consumed */
>  
> +	if (ctx->more) {
> +		err = af_alg_wait_for_data(sk, flags);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}

So what happens when sendmsg hasn't been called at all? In that
case ctx->more would be zero, and we would skip the wait right?

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists