lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:49:01 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Xie XiuQi' <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "brouer@...hat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>
CC:     "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "huangdaode@...ilicon.com" <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] trace/xdp: fix compile warning: ‘struct bpf_map’ declared inside parameter list

From: Xie XiuQi
> Sent: 29 November 2017 08:35
>
> We meet this compile warning, which caused by missing bpf.h in xdp.h.
> 
> In file included from ./include/trace/events/xdp.h:10:0,
>                  from ./include/linux/bpf_trace.h:6,
>                  from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c:29:
> ./include/trace/events/xdp.h:93:17: warning: struct bpf_map declared inside parameter list will not be
> visible outside of this definition or declaration
>     const struct bpf_map *map, u32 map_index),
>                  ^
...
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/xdp.h b/include/trace/events/xdp.h
> index 4cd0f05..8989a92 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/xdp.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/xdp.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  #include <linux/netdevice.h>
>  #include <linux/filter.h>
>  #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>

Isn't it just enough to add:
struct bpf_map;
before the first prototype instead of pulling in the entire header?

	David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists