lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:15:22 -0700
From:   Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>
To:     Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@...onical.com>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Vinícius Tinti <viniciustinti@...il.com>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Paolo Pisati
<paolo.pisati@...onical.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>
>> Worked for me too,
>> after updating snapcraft.
>>
>>
>> Is it really impossible to check the snapcraft version?
>> What is the minimum version?   2.35 ?
>
> The minimum version is 2.35+ - what is about to become 2.36 anytime soon now.

If I run /snap/bin/snapcraft --version now on that Ubuntu 16.04 VM I
am getting 2.36+git2.ae61453.

I noticed that if I tried to make snap-pkg with the O=/some/dir option
the tar step failed but the rest of the build continued, and seems to
have finished successfully.  Should the snap-pkg target stop after a
tar failure?

-- 
Jim

Powered by blists - more mailing lists