lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:15:22 -0700 From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com> To: Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@...onical.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, VinÃcius Tinti <viniciustinti@...il.com>, linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scripts/package: snap-pkg target On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Paolo Pisati <paolo.pisati@...onical.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Masahiro Yamada > <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote: >> >> Worked for me too, >> after updating snapcraft. >> >> >> Is it really impossible to check the snapcraft version? >> What is the minimum version? 2.35 ? > > The minimum version is 2.35+ - what is about to become 2.36 anytime soon now. If I run /snap/bin/snapcraft --version now on that Ubuntu 16.04 VM I am getting 2.36+git2.ae61453. I noticed that if I tried to make snap-pkg with the O=/some/dir option the tar step failed but the rest of the build continued, and seems to have finished successfully. Should the snap-pkg target stop after a tar failure? -- Jim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists