lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171130101943.15f7ade4@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:19:43 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] crypto: limit more FPU-enabled sections

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:22:17 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/camellia_aesni_avx2_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/camellia_aesni_avx2_glue.c
> index 60907c139c4e..d7502c023475 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/crypto/camellia_aesni_avx2_glue.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/camellia_aesni_avx2_glue.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,32 @@ struct crypt_priv {
>  	bool fpu_enabled;
>  };
>  
> +static void camellia_fpu_end_rt(struct crypt_priv *ctx)
> +{
> +#if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> +       bool fpu_enabled = ctx->fpu_enabled;
> +
> +       if (!fpu_enabled)
> +               return;
> +       camellia_fpu_end(fpu_enabled);
> +       ctx->fpu_enabled = false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static void camellia_fpu_sched_rt(struct crypt_priv *ctx)
> +{
> +#if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> +       bool fpu_enabled = ctx->fpu_enabled;
> +
> +       if (!fpu_enabled || !tif_need_resched_now())
> +               return;
> +       camellia_fpu_end(fpu_enabled);
> +       kernel_fpu_end();
> +       /* schedule due to preemptible */
> +       kernel_fpu_begin();
> +#endif
> +}

I think it would be cleaner to do:

#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
static void camellia_fpu_end_rt(struct crypt_priv *ctx)
{
       bool fpu_enabled = ctx->fpu_enabled;

       if (!fpu_enabled)
               return;
       camellia_fpu_end(fpu_enabled);
       ctx->fpu_enabled = false;
}

static void camellia_fpu_sched_rt(struct crypt_priv *ctx)
{
       bool fpu_enabled = ctx->fpu_enabled;

       if (!fpu_enabled || !tif_need_resched_now())
               return;
       camellia_fpu_end(fpu_enabled);
       kernel_fpu_end();
       /* schedule due to preemptible */
       kernel_fpu_begin();
}
#else
static inline void camellia_fpu_end_rt(struct crypt_priv *ctx) { }
static void camellia_fpu_sched_rt(struct crypt_priv *ctx) { }
#endif

It really shows that these functions are only used by RT. IMO it's bad
taste to have functions with the entire body encapsulated in #ifdefs.

And the same goes for the other functions in this patch.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ