[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519d86ca-1de8-060d-487f-0ee90451b957@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:57:16 -0500
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>,
Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
open-iscsi@...glegroups.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: BUG: KASAN: use-after-scope in ep_poll+0x5cd/0xc90
Hi,
On 11/29/2017 10:41 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> FYI this happens in mainline kernel 4.15.0-rc1.
> It looks a new regression and bisect is on the way.
>
> It occurs in 3 out of 3 boots.
>
> [ 35.704690] init: Failed to create pty - disabling logging for job
> [ 35.706676] init: Temporary process spawn error: No such file or directory
> [ 35.731988] init: Failed to create pty - disabling logging for job
> [ 35.734084] init: Temporary process spawn error: No such file or directory
> [ 35.737946] ==================================================================
> [ 35.739635] BUG: KASAN: use-after-scope in ep_poll+0x5cd/0xc90:
> ep_send_events at fs/eventpoll.c:1700
> (inlined by) ep_poll at fs/eventpoll.c:1829
This seems to be pointing out that 'struct ep_send_events_data esed' on
line 1700 (below) is being used out of scope?
1697 static int ep_send_events(struct eventpoll *ep,
1698 struct epoll_event __user *events, int
maxevents)
1699 {
1700 struct ep_send_events_data esed;
1701
1702 esed.maxevents = maxevents;
1703 esed.events = events;
1704
1705 return ep_scan_ready_list(ep, ep_send_events_proc, &esed,
0, false);
There have been some epoll changes new to 4.15 that would be tempting to
blame, but I don't see anything obvious wrong and the usage of 'esed'
hasn't really changed.
So I'm curious to see where your bisect leads. There also seems to be a
number of reports of false positives with KASAN out of scope reported
recently, so I'm not sure if this could be a false positive?
Thanks,
-Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists