[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171201051052.GX28761@minitux>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:10:52 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: pm8058: Make ledtype pointer sized type
On Thu 30 Nov 16:28 PST 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > of_device_get_match_data will return PM8058_LED_TYPE_*
> > > > which clearly is a led type identifier.
> > > >
> > > > Thus unsigned long looks reasonable.
> > >
> > > Hmm. Ok. So u32 would actually make even more sense there (because
> > > PM8058_LED_TYPE_* does not really need to be 64-bit), but it would
> > > cause a warning.
> > >
> > > I don't like this. This fix actually makes code waste memory and is
> > > uglier.
> > >
> > > ...but we get a warning fix. So I don't like the patch, but it is an
> > > improvement...
> >
> > I *think* you can get away with (u32)(unsigned long)ptr ...
>
> Yes, that should work. It would actually be my preferred solution.
>
I'm fine with this suggestion, and it silence the warning. I will update
and resend the patch.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists